skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Exhibition Project
Interaction Design, the Oslo School of Architecture
09 December 2007
..the content..
The content group, Fan Fan, Natacha, Martin and myself, had a little brainstorm on Friday, in search for a stronger link between the harp (physical) and the wall projection (visual). There were a lot of good ideas, but no final solution was reached.
One of the questions was whether to use live feed or still images. Whereas live feed allows for immediate feed-back, which is very playful but possibly a bit too centred around just the one current person playing, still pictures may show (as Martin pointed out) the diversity, and/or recent activity of visitors. As I believe the interaction should be concentrated on the harp and not on the camera, pictures could be shot automatically, at pre-set intervals. In this case sound may be a strong indicator as to when then photo is about to be taken/ when it 'shoots'. Mosse showed us a good example the other day with ‘The Origin of Painting’. We may of course consider a less nerve wrecking sound. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
Concept development
(16)
Ideas
(12)
Announcements
(9)
Discussion
(9)
Inspiration
(8)
Sketches
(8)
Video
(6)
software
(6)
visuals
(6)
Hardware
(4)
Web
(4)
out-put
(4)
Protoypes
(3)
code
(3)
processing.org
(3)
Exemple of the process of evolution
(2)
Pictures
(2)
Sound
(2)
harp
(2)
content
(1)
The Team
Anders Christensen
Christer
Jegor
Karin
Marius
Natacha Ruivo
Peder Torget
Svendsen
bareknut
ff
gcbb
immelie
ingrid
interactiondesign
marianne
martinsan
Links
jtnimoy
Lozano Hemmer
Expology
Stenslie
Agenda
No comments:
Post a Comment